No exposed Puppeteer / Playwright binding
Check id exposed-binding-leaks
What an ordinary browser yields
No controller binding artifact.
What a detector infers
Exposed functions leave Playwright/Puppeteer registries, prefixes, source text, or __installed markers.
How to resolve it
Do not expose controller bindings to window.
Nearby checks in Automation surface
- no Selenium / Puppeteer / Playwright globals
automation-globalsThis check tests a fixed list of roughly two dozen known names against both window and document (Selenium's __webdriver_evaluate /… - DevTools Runtime serialization is not active
runtime-enable-leakAn attached DevTools Runtime domain serialises console arguments and reads an Error stack accessor. - No Puppeteer / Playwright sourceURL marker
sourceurl-leakPuppeteer and Playwright evaluation labels can appear in main-world Error stacks. - No controller code crossed the main-world canary
main-world-executionAn early DOM canary records main-world calls, but page code and extensions can also call it, so this is contextual. - Content Security Policy is enforced
csp-bypassThe audit excludes data: scripts. Execution despite script-src is direct CSP-bypass behavior. - window.chrome present for a Chrome UA
chrome-objectThis is a cross-check, not a probe of window.chrome's contents: it first decides whether the browser claims to be Chrome (a Chrome/ token in… - window.chrome.* helpers are native (not JS stubs)
chrome-native-stubsWhere the previous check asks whether window.chrome exists, this one asks whether its members are genuine. - no notifications-permission headless bug
permissions-notification-bugTwo independent APIs describe the same underlying notification permission: navigator.permissions.query({name:'notifications'}) returns a…
Clearcote is a browser built for fingerprint coherence
It is a Chromium fork, maintained by the same people who wrote this reference. It ships as a compiled browser rather than as a stealth script injected into someone else's — which is a description of how it is built, and is not an argument about how it behaves on this check.
This audit takes no position on how Clearcote scores on Automation surface checks, on this one, or anywhere else. It has no baseline corpus of other people's fingerprints to rank you against and no vendor scoreboard — nearly every check is self-referential, asking one browser the same question through two independent APIs and reporting whether both answers can be true at once. It runs identically on any browser, including ours. Run it on yours and read the result yourself.
See the other checks in Automation surface — the family exposed-binding-leaks belongs to.