Skip to content
All fingerprint checks
Render & GPU

A WebGPU device accepts every limit and feature its adapter advertises

Pim· Clearcote Research 2 min readCheck id webgpu-device-honours-adapter

requestDevice with every advertised feature and every limit at its advertised value succeeds, and the device reports those limits. N/A without an adapter (severity: info).

What a detector infers

A WebGPU adapter advertises limits and features, and the device it creates is validated against them by Dawn, Chrome's WebGPU implementation, using the adapter's real values (rounded down into a few standard tiers so they fingerprint less). So a request for a device with every advertised feature and every limit at its advertised maximum always succeeds on a genuine adapter: requestDevice only refuses what exceeds the adapter it came from.

A page-level spoof that inflates adapter.limits or adds names to adapter.features to look like a stronger GPU produces exactly such a request, and the device creation is refused; and a device that is created has to report the same limits it was asked for. That makes this the WebGPU counterpart of webgl-limits-vs-driver: the advertisement is tested by asking the implementation to honour it.

Only one side is measured — the request succeeded on every stock browser tested with a GPU, and the invariant is confirmed in Dawn's source — but no failing spoof was available, so the row is information only. requestDevice is called once per adapter, because a second call on the same adapter legitimately returns a lost device. N/A when no adapter is returned, which is ordinary for a blocklisted GPU.

How to resolve it

Do not edit adapter.limits or adapter.features in the page. The device is validated against the real adapter, so an advertisement larger than the hardware fails the moment anything asks for it.

Spec invariants as lie detectors

Nearby checks in Render & GPU

See all 64 checks in Render & GPU
Who builds this test

Clearcote is a browser built for fingerprint coherence

It is a Chromium fork, maintained by the same people who wrote this reference. It ships as a compiled browser rather than as a stealth script injected into someone else's — which is a description of how it is built, and is not an argument about how it behaves on this check.

This audit takes no position on how Clearcote scores on Render & GPU checks, on this one, or anywhere else. It has no baseline corpus of other people's fingerprints to rank you against and no vendor scoreboard — nearly every check is self-referential, asking one browser the same question through two independent APIs and reporting whether both answers can be true at once. It runs identically on any browser, including ours. Run it on yours and read the result yourself.

See the other checks in Render & GPU — the family webgpu-device-honours-adapter belongs to.